Last night the lovely Dr.
Farish and I went out for dinner and a show. Being upper tier, almost
aristocratic snobby types,
 |
Like this, but in color, and I'm not the PM of England.
|
we usually hit the Roller
Derby,
 |
| I'm the distinguished gentleman in the background. |
but this time decided to break up the routine a bit and return
to Medieval Madness. Think dinner theater, only far less scripted,
the audience gets involved, it's set in the 1300's, there's actual
sword-fights, and the food is actually quite good.
 |
| This will teach you to not take the last slice of roast beef again! |
Oh yes, they have a
LARGE selection of beer, ales, mead, and wine; inebriation is
almost required. Dr. Farish and I have been there several times before,
and it's always a fun experience. Last night, after the show, the wife
and I talked to the owners/ main performers, and they asked what we
thought of the new material they were trying out. It was tough to
reply, did I have a good time? Yes, definitely. Will I return?
Damn skippy. Would I recommend others to go? Yep.
But the new show was just
okay in my mind. It wasn't bad, but for what ever reason if just did
not make me laugh as much last night as in prior times. Perhaps it
was me. Different things are more or less funny to me depending upon
my mood. Worse there was no one thing I could really put my finger
on, no one screwed up their lines, parts were quite good, the sword
fight was the best I've seen, and I had a great seat for watching it.
Food was great and there was enough of it, and I tried out a new beer
which was very tasty. And yet....
 |
| Get to the point already! |
Occasionally the same thing
happens when I've been asked to critique a book. Now it is easy to give an honest and
in-depth critique if the book is excellent, or if it's crappy.
I've read books where the formatting had words all over the place,
one where an entire chapter was repeated. There have been cases where
there were so many typos, misspellings, and poorly constructed
sentences, that I had to stop. I have run into stories that
were two-dimensional, where it was all tell, and read like a giant
run on sentences, devoid of emotion or movement.
 |
| This book needs a good burning! |
Then there are more
technical matters, where someone has a character jumping out of a jet
going Mach-one, without a parachute only to land on a “just
happened to be in the neighborhood,” blimp, and after subduing the
entire, evil league of evil, crew with a toothpick and one liners,
the hero lands in time to rescue the orphans from their burning
building. Or the characters are sneaking into a hostile country on a
super-classified, plausibly deniable, secret-squirrel mission, to take
care of bad guys toting only US equipment, with their team logo “Good
Guys Justice Society,” prominently displayed.
 |
| No one will ever guess it was us - totally super secret! |
There is character
development, where the MC is a bit of a dick, or goes out of his way
to kick puppies, or has a back story either bland or incongruous to
the situation, “Steve lost the bet, and sacrificed his parents on
the blood stained alter of Frodo the Hobbit. He then went on to run
the day care in a kind and loving manner, until he met Marissia,
daughter of a billionaire who, after being tossed out of her last
porn movie for being 'overly slutty' and filled to the gills with
cheap tequila, just happened to clip Steve's car when he was at the
Farmer's Market to buy fresh food for the children.”
That's an easy to critique
story, but what do you do when you have finished the story and it's
really not made any impression? When there was nothing wrong with the
book, but it was just okay. You have no desire to prepare
an auto-de-fe for the author, but at the same time the story did
nothing for you? It's easy to spot mistakes, or poor character
development, or even far to many pant-less clown jokes, but when the
story was 'blah?'
 |
| Yeaaaa. I got nothing here man. |
Those are the tough
critiques for me. Perhaps it was just a one off, I was having a bad
day, or was sleepy while reading or something. The only problem is I
have very little desire to read the book a second time in order to
give it a second chance. And so when the author inevitably asks “what
did you think,” I have a tough time answering. I try to help, but
it comes across more as bumbling Cthulhu chants that a coherent
critique; when the story is just “meh,” there's not much advice I can give.
Now for a story that's
really not “meh,” my book Junior Inquisitor.
Okay there is one 3 star
rating, but there's 30 five-star ratings.
It's got the thrills you
crave.